Professional Opportunities


What can you do with a bachelor’s degree in psychology? Like this title, the actual answer is complicated

Stop me if you have already heard this one. Psychology is one of the most popular undergraduate majors in the U.S.; in the last year the data are available (2014-2015), 117,557 bachelor’s degrees in psychology were awarded. Said another way, in the past nine years, 1 million individuals received psychology baccalaureates (National Center for Education Statistics, 2017).


The I-O Playbook: Bringing Psychological Assessments to the NFL

Three industrial-organizational psychologists have brought a whole new field to psychology—Dr. Harold Goldstein, Dr. Kenneth Yusko, and Dr. Charles Scherbaum have given the National Football League (NFL) an innovative and evidence-based tool for selecting players during the draft using their extensive research and experience in personnel selection and industrial-organizational (I-O) psychology. Their work designing, implementing, and validating a new psychological test called the NFL Player Assessment Test (NFL-PAT) has shown how the science of I-O can be applied in new, sophisticated, and very cool ways.



Understanding the Value and Reach of High School Psychology

After 30 years of working for the Lincoln Public Schools (LPS; Nebraska) as a high school teacher and a curriculum developer, I recently made the jump to higher education. My professional identity during my time with LPS was centered around the teaching of psychology. This change from secondary school education to a university has given me time to pause and reflect on those 30 years. Often overlooked in importance, reflection is a good practice for all teachers. During the past three decades, the teaching of high school psychology has come a long way.

Thirty years ago, we didn’t have the APA Teachers of Psychology in Secondary Schools (TOPSS), and we certainly didn’t have standards for teaching high school psychology.

There was no Advanced Placement (AP) psychology test and many wondered if there would be enough demand for AP psych to support it.

It was common to hear of high school psychology as a “touchy-feely” elective.  A biology teacher teased me about psychology being a “pseudo-science”.

Times have changed.

Thanks to the formation of TOPSS and the work of dozens of teachers and psychologists connected to APA, we have high school psychology standards. In fact, we’re on our third revision of the standards and a fourth is planned.

According to data from the College Board, the AP Psychology course is wildly popular. More students take this exam than the economics test, the geography test, or the world history test. In fact, more students take AP psychology than AP Biology.  The International Baccalaureate (IB) psychology exam also ranks high among IB tests in terms of exam volume.

High school psychology students learn about hypothesis testing, the central nervous system, and how to use statistics when conducting research. That’s not touchy-feely, and it’s no surprise some states are considering making psychology a science credit.

Not everything has changed. Despite the huge number of on-level and AP psychology high school students nationwide, despite the relevance of psychology courses to students’ lives, and despite the many benefits of studying psychology, psychology courses are still not widely seen in K-12 education as important, serious courses of study.  It is common for school principals to assign psychology courses to teachers with little (and sometimes no) background knowledge in psychology.   There is much work still to be done to promote a greater understanding of high school psychology’s value, reach, and the way it’s delivered and assessed.

Understanding the Value and Reach of High School Psychology

The recently announced APA Summit on High School Psychology Education should be just the vehicle for developing the materials necessary to help school administrators, state boards of education, parents, and other external groups and stakeholders better understand the value and reach of high school psychology. My guess is that most who work outside the discipline of psychology are unaware of high school psychology’s growth over the past 25 years. These outside groups are not alone; who among us has reflected on how the teaching of high school psychology has been transformed during the past three decades? With the Summit on the horizon it is also time to ponder and reflect not just on how far we’ve come as high school psychology teachers, but where we should go in the near future. What would make for an even better high school psychology class?  An APA steering committee composed of high school psychology teachers and college professors has been meeting to prepare for the Summit that will address this and many more questions related to the ideal high school psychology. For instance:

  1. What skills should our students have by the time they leave our course? Are there teachable skills that would help all students flourish? How do we assess these skills?
  2. With the increasing understanding of how we are culturally insensitive to others based on ethnicity, gender, and religion, how do we improve the likelihood that high school psychology students leave the course more culturally competent than when they entered?
  3. With computers becoming more and more of a staple in classrooms across the country, how do we leverage technology to improve the delivery of the science of psychology?
  4. Can psychology somehow bridge the gap between science and social studies, perhaps finding a home in both arenas? One need only look at the table of contents to see that psychology qualifies as a STEM course while addressing social issues such and conformity, motivation, and discrimination.

If you are interested in helping answer these questions, please consider submitting an application to participate in the week-long Summit held next July at Weber State University in Ogden, Utah. We’re looking for participants who can help us reflect on how we currently teach high school psychology and craft a vision for improving high school psychology education the future. Think about our challenge. We hope you will apply to join us next summer at this historic event.

Summit Poster


Don’t Be A Marshmallow: My Experience with Advocacy

“Your child is bright. He could grow up to become the President of the United States.” I was in the fifth grade when I heard those words from my teacher. Because my parents spoke only Spanish, I was asked to be the translator at my own parent-teacher conference. I relayed the words to my parents with mixed emotions. I was proud hearing them, but also troubled. I knew at an early age I could never become the President of the United States—I was an undocumented immigrant. Yes, I was bright and I had goals and ambitions, but I was uncertain whether I could ever reach them. Through hard work and perseverance, my family earned our permanent resident card and, in 2009, we became U.S. citizens.

I have seen first-hand how policy initiatives can represent both obstacles and opportunities for disadvantaged and diverse individuals. Fortunately for me, my early experiences sparked an enduring passion to help these groups, both on an individual and societal level.

Over the past two years I’ve had the privilege of participating in visits to “the Hill” (Capitol Hill) where I’ve spoken about the benefits of the Graduate Psychology Education (GPE) Program. The GPE Program is the nation’s primary federal program dedicated to funding the training of doctoral-level psychologists. Graduate students and interns are trained in interprofessional collaboration and learn how to provide behavioral and mental health services to vulnerable and underserved populations. The GPE program is a great fit with my personal and career goals of helping underrepresented groups receive cost-effective, evidence-based health care services.

I distinctly remember my first Hill visit, mainly because I was a ball of nerves! Though I had the passion to be involved in policy work, I wasn’t sure where to begin. As a graduate student in clinical psychology, I was taught about the science and practice of psychology, but here I was treading new waters, trying to connect my knowledge base to policy issues and efforts. Before I got involved in this kind of work, I found advocacy intimidating. I thought, “Can I contribute to these discussions? Will Senators and Representatives listen to what I have to say? Can I make a meaningful difference?” Fortunately, the answer to all three questions was YES.

Prior to the Hill visits, Sheila Lane Forsyth and Alexandra Ginsberg from APA’s Education Government Relations Office provided excellent training on how to translate my knowledge and experience into a story­ that can connect with congressional staffers, Senators, and Representatives. After training, I was more confident that I had something to contribute to these discussions. Most importantly, I learned that my lived experiences and my work as a behavioral health consultant were compelling talking points.

When we arrived at the Hill, I felt a mix of emotions. I felt grateful to have the opportunity and I felt excited to meet my state’s congress people. I was in awe as I walked through the corridors and hallways where history has been made. I also felt, once more, a bit terrified. I was worried that I would not be an effective advocate, but those fears and worries disappeared after my first meeting. It was affirming (and cool!) to see that congressional staffers and congress people were interested in my message. Staffers were very cordial and had many questions about the GPE program and how it affected lives in my local community. The in-person meeting helped me develop a personal relationship with each office we visited and helped put a face to each request we made. In fact, I have continued to have follow-up contact with congressional offices even after my visit to DC.

Of course, I was ecstatic to learn later that Congress supported APA’s request for additional GPE funding! I know that I was just one small part of this effort, but my experience with advocacy taught me we can make a meaningful difference!

It was quite the lesson: That we psychologists can have an impact on a much larger, societal level. We can advance the science and practice of psychology by informing key policy makers about ways to have a positive impact on human welfare.

On my latest visit to the Hill, I had a chance to tour the Smithsonian, in particular the National Portrait Gallery. I was drawn to an exhibit on Dolores Huerta, a Latina civil rights activist who was a strong advocate for the rights of farm workers, labor unions, and women. It was a marvelous exhibit and featured this quote, which has had a profound effect on me:

Don’t be a marshmallow.
Walk the street with us into history.
Get off the sidewalk.
Work for justice
.”

This is a call for all of us to be engaged in advocacy. As psychologists, helping people should also include promoting human rights and calling for social justice. I will never be the President of the United States, but I can do my part to help raise awareness about the value of psychology as a science and how it can be used improve the lives of those who are often overlooked and in need.



Why Advocate?

Psychologists and psychological scientists have a rich history of being engaged in federal education policy development that the American Psychological Association continues to pursue across our advocacy.